Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
potchi79
Member Profile
Real Name: matt
Birthdate: July 26th, 1979 (30 years old)
Bio:
Decided to create account AFTER Videosift destroyed their backups.
Member Since: 2009-03-25
Email: jmstone L0CATED+AT gmailD0Tcom
Last Power Points used: never • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now

Comments
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 1 day 38 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Your video was a dupe, I'm afraid.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Giant-Leopard-Seal-Trys-to-Feed-and-Care-For-NatGeo-Diver -> http://www.videosift.com/video/Up-close-photography-of-a-leopard-seal

Not sure why siftbot didn't suggest it as a dupe, since both videos share three separate tags. Odd.


written by demon_ix  | 1 day 23 hours 40 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Do you have a link to the CBO report? I can't find that one on the CBO web site.

Here is the article...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25415.html

And Rangal's original letter.

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/104xx/doc10464/hr3200.pdf

Now - the report is pretty plain. There are no ACTUAL savings found. It theorizes that there MIGHT be savings down the line, but that is based on projections. Historically, the government's budget projections are highly unreliable. The upshot is that the CBO found no support for the claims that the House bill would result in savings. Obama's and Weiner's claims are all based on thier opinions or on speculative projections which may be less reliable than a 10 year weather projection.


written by Winstonfield_Pennypacker  | 3 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 4 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 7 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
fuckinA

In reply to this comment by potchi79:
Fantastic. I will seriously consider trying this if it ever happens to me. I'm already fed up with their ridiculous $10 fee for transferring money from savings when I overdraw my checking. It should be free unless I totally overdraw all accounts. That's what I thought the ODP was for.

Of course, every time they have to transfer money, a guy has to go into a vault somewhere and remove the cash and then drive it to another vault and put it in. I mean, that's how banks work right? That's why all the BS charges; to pay for labor, right?



written by JiggaJonson  | 7 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook
          - OR -
log in or register to submit new comment


1
Member Stats
Rank: no rank yet
Rating: 0 star points
Votes Cast: 443
Comments Posted: 180 • browse
Comments Applauded: 4
Profile Views: 1998